Home <

About Us <

Links <

Columns <

Our Store <

Contact Us <

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Text Box: Wholly Human
Last week I dealt briefly with the way many people use language to intentionally mislead the general public about the embryonic stem cell research issue. The way in which each phrase is used, stem cell research and “embryonic” stem cell research, makes it seem that they are interchangeable practices when in fact they are worlds apart. 

This week, let’s do something in this column that practically nobody, at least as far as I know, is doing. Let’s talk about embryonic stem cell research and actually include the embryo as part of the equation. It is, after all, the main component in the debate isn’t it?

Of course, I wouldn’t be the credible writer I claim to be if I didn’t allow “science” to weigh in on the debate, would I?  Science does have a place in our study and according to Dr. Bruce Little, (Southeastern Seminary) “no doubt” exists in the scientific community “that human life begins at fertilization.” Quoting another writer, he also points out that “…the single-cell human zygote formed after fertilization..., contains ‘46’ chromosomes…, (the number of chromosomes which is specific for members of the human species), and those 46 chromosomes are mixed differently from the ‘46’ chromosomes as found in the mother or in the father – that is, they are unique for that human individual.”  In other words, at its earliest stage the fertilized egg isn’t only human but individually human; because “essential to human life is present at the point of fertilization.” (Class Notes)

Now, the next logical question has to do with personhood. In other words, at what point does the human embryo become an actual person? This is important because “if personhood is simultaneous with fertilization then that is the point at which the individual becomes a human being; i.e. a living person, and should be treated as such.” (Dr. Little) This translates into the possible stoppage of any and all embryonic stem cell research and, in turn, “scares the pants” off the popular “pro-choice” movement. 

Think about it. If special protection were afforded the unborn at stage-1, upon fertilization, then the same protection for any other stage may soon follow. That would spell trouble for the abortionist movement. 

The next question is basic. If personhood isn’t simultaneous with fertilization, then at what point does it become a living “person.” If you hold to a “delayed personhood” position, then at what point in the gestation period does the unborn become a living “person?”  Does he/she become a person when the heart begins to beat? Does he/she become a person worthy of protection when it begins to move, kick, suck its thumb or feed itself? 

You can’t dismiss this question if you really want answers. In fact, it is the very thing that makes embryonic stem cell research a moral issue. 

If our personhood is based on mere function then any of us could cease to be the person we are right now. If we weren’t human “beings” until we began to function in a certain way as embryos and/or fetuses, then we can cease to be the person we now are at some point in the future. In other words, any one of us, logically speaking, can loose the very “function” that made us persons in the first place.  

The implications are serious. Remember Terri Schiavo.  “She wasn’t a person,” many people said because she couldn’t function in a way that the “state” considered normal and was, as a result, killed. 

Finally, if you are of the opinion that personhood arises at some point after fertilization, you will get no help from the scientific world. The Bible, however, gives us insight into such matters. “And everything shall bring forth after its own kind,” it says; and that coincides with the known scientific data on the reproduction process. Really now, did you expect any different? The newly conceived child is purely human and wholly human – as conception creates the entire person. Logically speaking, what else could it be?  

No living human being should be subjugated to a process that involves the creation of a human being for the purpose of destroying it, no matter how noble it sounds to a generation that has already lost its moral way. 

Tony can be reached at Tony@link2eternity.com

Home    About Us   Links    Contact Us

 

Home    About Us    Contact Us    Links

 

Abortion: Wholly Human

Salvation         let us know what you think          Why Apologetics         Jesus vs Oprah

Link   eternity

2Where Truth and love link to reach the world

Essays